Bhanwari Devi May 2026

It was in this moment of absolute despair that Bhanwari Devi found an unlikely ally: a group of feminist lawyers and human rights activists in Jaipur. They filed a public interest litigation (PIL) not to retry the rape—though that would come later—but to define what workplace sexual harassment meant in a country that had no law against it. At the time of Bhanwari Devi’s rape, India had no specific law against sexual harassment at the workplace. The Indian Penal Code only covered rape and outraging modesty, but it did not address the systemic power dynamics of harassment. The Supreme Court of India took up the PIL (titled Vishakha & Ors v. State of Rajasthan ), using Bhanwari Devi’s case as the foundational fact.

In the annals of Indian social justice, certain names echo through courtrooms and legislative chambers: Nirbhaya, Shakti Mills, Bilkis Bano. But before any of these became national symbols, there was Bhanwari Devi. A sathin (friend) of the state’s women’s development program, Bhanwari Devi was a potter from a small village in Rajasthan whose courage in the face of feudal brutality gave birth to the legal framework that now protects millions of working women across India: the Vishakha Guidelines . bhanwari devi

Yet, in a rare turn of events, the Supreme Court intervened. In 2017, on the 25th anniversary of her rape, the Supreme Court upheld the conviction of Badri Lal, restoring the life sentence. The court observed that lower courts had been swayed by "caste prejudices and patriarchal mindsets." As of today, Bhanwari Devi continues to fight for the conviction of the remaining four accused. Now in her 60s, Bhanwari Devi lives in a modest house on the outskirts of Jaipur, still fighting for her children’s education and her own safety. She is no longer a sathin . The government pension she receives is meager. She has been forgotten by the same state machinery she once served. It was in this moment of absolute despair

The verdict was a legal and moral catastrophe. The state, which had empowered Bhanwari Devi to fight child marriage, had now abandoned her. The law had validated the feudal logic of the rapists. The acquittal did not end Bhanwari Devi’s nightmare; it intensified it. The Gujjars, emboldened by the court’s blessing, launched a campaign of social and physical terror. Her family was boycotted; no one would buy their pottery or give her husband work. Her children were beaten at school. Their house was burned down. For years, the family lived as refugees in their own district, moving from rented shack to rented shack, sleeping in police stations for protection. The Indian Penal Code only covered rape and

The message was medieval: A lower-caste woman who asserted legal authority over an upper-caste man must be put back in her place through sexual violence. It was not merely a crime of passion; it was a calculated act of feudal punishment. Bhanwari Devi did what almost no Dalit rape survivor dared to do at the time: She filed a First Information Report (FIR) immediately. The case went to trial as State of Rajasthan v. Bhanwari Devi (a misnomer, as she was the victim, not the accused). The trial court in Jodhpur heard the evidence. The medical examination confirmed sexual assault. Witnesses testified.