The Malookiat system was initially opposed by Muslim scholars and theologians, who considered it as a form of jahiliyyah (ignorance) and a threat to the unity and solidarity of the Islamic ummah. However, with the rise of Muslim dynasties and empires, such as the Umayyads, Abbasids, and Ottomans, the Malookiat system gained acceptance and became a dominant form of government in the Islamic world.
Malookiat, also known as Monarchy or Kingship, is a system of government where a king or a monarch exercises supreme power and authority over a kingdom or a state. In the context of Islamic history, Malookiat emerged as a rival system of government that competed with the Khilafat institution. The term "Malookiat" is derived from the Arabic word "malik," which means "king" or "ruler."
you can download and read
The concepts of Khilafat and Malookiat are two fundamental institutions in Islamic polity that have been a subject of debate and discussion among scholars, politicians, and the general public for centuries. Both institutions have their roots in Islamic history and have played a significant role in shaping the course of Muslim politics and society.
As Muslims navigate the complexities of modern governance and leadership, it is essential to revisit the principles and practices of Khilafat and Malookiat and to explore new models of Islamic governance that are compatible with modern values and institutions. khilafat o malookiat pdf english
http://dspace.ncl.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1986/3233/Khilafat%20and%20Malookiat%20-%20a%20critical%20analysis.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
or direct link
The Malookiat system was often seen as a threat to the unity and solidarity of the Islamic ummah, as it promoted tribal and regional loyalties over Islamic solidarity. On the other hand, the Khilafat institution was seen as a symbol of Islamic unity and a guarantee of the implementation of Islamic law and principles.