We must leave behind the (the caudillo ), whether of the left or right. The future is horizontal or it is not at all.
We didn’t just lose the future. We sold it. To “volver al futuro,” we must dig. The future is not ahead; it is buried beneath the asphalt of the present.
Silicon Valley invents; Latin America reparates (repairs). The future of technology is not the shiny new iPhone; it is the techno-vernacular . Consider the aguatero in Lima who uses WhatsApp to organize water delivery to informal settlements. Or the Venezuelan bitcoin miners running rigs off solar panels to bypass hyperinflation. Or the Cuban paquete semanal (weekly package) of downloaded internet content, a physical workaround for digital censorship.
Introduction: The Ghost of a Future That Never Came For most of the 20th century, Latin America was a laboratory of the future. From the futuristic utopias of Brasília (1960) to the cybernetic socialism of Salvador Allende’s Project Cybersyn (1971), the region dreamed in technicolor. Yet, by the turn of the millennium, that future seemed to have been cancelled. The narrative shifted: Latin America became a land of “eternal present,” a place of cyclical crises, informal economies, and magical realism—a genre that, as critics noted, stopped being magical when reality became too absurd to invent.
In the 1960s and 70s, Latin American futurism was radical. Architects like Lina Bo Bardi and Oscar Niemeyer built concrete poems of possibility. Writers like Jorge Luis Borges and Julio Cortázar bent time like a Mobius strip. The future was a left-wing project: land reform, industrialization, and sovereignty.
Welcome back to the Latino future. You’ve been here all along.
